Re: [OT] Power Stroke (was: foundations of relational theory?)

From: frostalicious <frostyj_at_nospam.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:17:05 -0800
Message-ID: <vq59p2sb7c1b22_at_corp.supernews.com>

frostalicious wrote:
>> Besides, I have already compensated with my F350 Crew Cab XL dually
>> so I have little need for a Napoleonic complex.
>
> Ahh... Power Stroke Diesel... the perfect compensation! One question:
> Are you running the old 7.3L or the new, theoretically superior 6.0L?
>
I've got the old 7.3, myself. May be obsolete, but it keeps running. Have you been having problems with your new 6.0? Having a hard time accepting that the advanced design doesn't work as well in the real world? I can see how that would be difficult for you to accept.

frosty

Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 19:17:05 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joe: "Re: foundations of relational theory?"
Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: Question regarding Larson's "Linear Hashing with Partial Expansions" whitepaper"
Maybe in reply to: frostalicious: "[OT] Power Stroke (was: foundations of relational theory?)"
In reply to Bob Badour: "Re: foundations of relational theory?"
Next in thread: Joe: "Re: foundations of relational theory?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message