Re: Dropping ACID - was Re: does a table always need a PK?

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne_at_acm.org>
Date: 2 Sep 2003 14:53:12 GMT
Message-ID: <bj2asn$egqfv$2_at_ID-125932.news.uni-berlin.de>


Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when "Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> would write:
> Christopher, if you look back a few months in c.d.t, you will see some posts under
> the threads 'Transactions: good or bad?' and '"Transactions are bad, real bad" -
> discuss' where I was defending my personal position that transactions are not
> compatable with the logical level of the relational model.

Looks to be worth a read; those are pretty long threads, so certainly aren't something to quickly comment on.

If you had some central "thesis" to present that distilled the necessary bits, that would be helpful...

-- 
select 'cbbrowne' || '_at_' || 'acm.org';
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/internet.html
Rules of the  Evil Overlord #43. "I will maintain  a healthy amount of
skepticism when  I capture the beautiful  rebel and she  claims she is
attracted  to my  power  and good  looks  and will  gladly betray  her
companions if I just let her in on my plans."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
Received on Tue Sep 02 2003 - 16:53:12 CEST

Original text of this message