Re: does a table always need a PK?
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 08:48:29 -0400
Message-ID: <wu15b.366$Ys1.39099485_at_mantis.golden.net>
"Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:g2V4b.6089$Lk5.1952_at_newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Bob Badour wrote:
> > "Morten Gulbrandsen" <Morten.Gulbrandsen_at_rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> >>Then I'd like to investigate D&D's _TTM_, whatever it is.
> >
> >
> > D&D are C.J. Date and Hugh Darwen. _TTM_ is an acronym for "The Third
> > Manifesto" or more completely: _Foundation for Object/Relational
Databases,
> > The Third Manifesto_
>
> That's the first edition; the second edition has a different title:
>
> Foundation for Future Database Systems: The Third Manifesto.
>
> The content of the second edition, mainly in the area of type
> inheritance, is significantly different from the first edition.
Mea culpa. The first edition is down here by the computer and the second edition is upstairs beside my bed... Received on Tue Sep 02 2003 - 14:48:29 CEST