Re: Plural or singular table names
From: Paul Vernon <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:38:03 +0100
Message-ID: <bj03rm$1gr2$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 19:38:03 +0100
Message-ID: <bj03rm$1gr2$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com>
"Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in message
news:bj02ov$1332$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com...
> "Ray Cassick (home)" <raycassNOSPAM_at_adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:4qf4b.11737$Nc.6608551_at_news1.news.adelphia.net...
> > Well my company is going through its processes of writing company standards
> > documents and we are at the age old question:
> >
> > "Should table names be in the plural or singular forms?"
> [snip]
>
> For what it is worth, my rather strong belief is that attributes should be named so
> that they capture as far as possible the tuple predicted.
Sorry, that should have been 'tuple predicate' Received on Mon Sep 01 2003 - 20:38:03 CEST