Re: does a table always need a PK?
From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <lgcdutra_at_terra.com.br>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:21:19 +0200
Message-Id: <pan.2003.08.27.11.21.17.795708_at_terra.com.br>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 13:21:19 +0200
Message-Id: <pan.2003.08.27.11.21.17.795708_at_terra.com.br>
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:44:11 +0000, Lee Fesperman wrote:
> FirstSQL/J is not yet compliant with all of Codd's 12 Rules. However, we are improving
> in that area and are the only DBMS vendor dedicated to relational fidelity. It's on our
> to-do list!
Great! Do you have a timeline for Codd's 12 rules, then for RMv2,
then for RM/T? It's a tall order... anyway, for whatever it's worth, I
think I'll give you a place at
http://dmoz.org./Computers/Software/Databases/Relational/Implementations/.
Then we could have competition on merits: D4 against FirstSQL... I must confess I'd be hard pressed to choose between a D and a portable RM/T... perhaps the first to GPL its product would win me!
-- _ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 648 11 34 / \ http://br.geocities.com./lgcdutra/ +41 (78) 778 11 34 \ / Answer to the list, not to me directly! +55 (11) 5686 2219 / \ Rate this if helpful: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=leandroReceived on Wed Aug 27 2003 - 13:21:19 CEST