Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 02:44:49 GMT
Message-ID: <BCEua.261887$Si4.205632_at_rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 02:44:49 GMT
Message-ID: <BCEua.261887$Si4.205632_at_rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>
Is it that your objection to transactions is that they can stay open for a while? You don't object to multiple operations being bundled together atomically, is that right? So if you had a transaction-like mechanism that made several operations atomic, but that took place all in an instant, would that be okay?
Marshall Received on Fri May 09 2003 - 04:44:49 CEST