Re: "Transactions are bad, real bad" - discuss
From: Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 14:17:06 -0500
Message-ID: <Xns936F8724A1737pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
>
> and your point is?
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 14:17:06 -0500
Message-ID: <Xns936F8724A1737pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233>
"Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in news:b8u5s0$476q$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com:
> "Pablo Sanchez" <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote in message
> news:Xns936F5E05242C2pingottpingottbah_at_216.166.71.233...
>> "Paul Vernon" <paul.vernon_at_ukk.ibmm.comm> wrote in >> news:b8to09$2178$1_at_gazette.almaden.ibm.com: >> >> > 12:15 is some arbitrary time after the auction closes and after the >> > row was committed. >> > >> > Maybe you need to try it in your favourite DBMS. I don't have >> > Oracle, so can only simulate it's AS OF function: >> >> ebay uses Oracle as their backend. >>
>
> and your point is?
Sorry, I guess I was too obtuse, your example was using a TX for an auction and then you cited Oracle. I found it humorous that Ebay (auction) is using Oracle with transactions.
> Although if it is to chide me for mentioning another DBMS a little too
> often for a theory newsgroup. Accept my apologies.
Nah, mention whatever ya want... I should be getting my hands on DB2 relatively soon ...
-- Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering http://www.hpdbe.comReceived on Fri May 02 2003 - 21:17:06 CEST