Re: Field naming: Same name represents different data
From: --CELKO-- <71062.1056_at_compuserve.com>
Date: 26 Feb 2003 14:42:31 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0302261442.3ef5416d_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 26 Feb 2003 14:42:31 -0800
Message-ID: <c0d87ec0.0302261442.3ef5416d_at_posting.google.com>
>> That is just what I was seeking! [ISO-11179] <<
I am going to look into some vendor conventions about postfixes like "_id", "_code", "_date", etc. Teradata has an internal set of conventions with definitions and I'll bet other people do too. Now, we jnly have to get them into ISO-11179 and approved ....
>> I may be new, but I recognize your name, <<
It's that damn "serial killer" thing again, isn't it? Eat one, little, tiny baby and that's all people remember about you! You don't even have to finish all of it!! :)) Received on Wed Feb 26 2003 - 23:42:31 CET