Re: oracle sequence numbers

From: Bob Hairgrove <rhairgroveNoSpam_at_Pleasebigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:29:59 GMT
Message-ID: <3e2707f5.1213124_at_news.webshuttle.ch>

On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:40:02 -0600, Pablo Sanchez <pablo_at_dev.null> wrote:

>Even worst, some DBMS update the timestamp any time the row is
>affected since the timestamp data type is used for other purposes.

Huh??

Once you have written a value to a column, it should stay the same (unless you have a trigger implemented to update it)...

Bob Hairgrove
rhairgroveNoSpam_at_Pleasebigfoot.com Received on Thu Jan 16 2003 - 20:29:59 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Bob Hairgrove: "Re: oracle sequence numbers"
Previous message: Undercover Elephant: "Re: researching advanced v's 'traditional' databases"
Maybe in reply to: helen_fearman: "oracle sequence numbers"
In reply to Pablo Sanchez: "Re: oracle sequence numbers"
Next in thread: Bob Hairgrove: "Re: oracle sequence numbers"
Reply: Tibor Karaszi: "Re: oracle sequence numbers"
Reply: Pablo Sanchez: "Re: oracle sequence numbers"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message