Re: Which normal form is this violating?
From: Andrew Hamm <ahamm_at_sanderson.net.au>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:47:05 +1000
Message-ID: <aatbpc$divu4$1_at_ID-79573.news.dfncis.de>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 16:47:05 +1000
Message-ID: <aatbpc$divu4$1_at_ID-79573.news.dfncis.de>
Andrew Hamm wrote in message ...
>>
>I think he probably meant "distinct" sets... Don't let the argument get
lost
>in pedantry.
>
Even I can't express myself properly - sheesh....
Anyway, apply a bit of imagination.
Received on Fri May 03 2002 - 08:47:05 CEST