Re: Flamewar object databases vs. relational databases (was: Unknown SQL)
From: Carl Rosenberger <carl_at_db4o.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:20:25 +0200
Message-ID: <9fb3pq$43i$06$1_at_news.t-online.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 18:20:25 +0200
Message-ID: <9fb3pq$43i$06$1_at_news.t-online.com>
Bob Badour wrote:
> >If you use a pure OODBMS, then you have an OO system.
>
> I disagree. Since relational supports objects directly, you still have an
OO
> system. In a strict and precise sense, relational is already an OODBMS.
This is not true.
Could you please provide evidence by naming vendor and statement to store:
class Person
class Employee extends Person
Kind regards,
Carl
--- Carl Rosenberger db4o - database for objects - http://www.db4o.comReceived on Sat Jun 02 2001 - 18:20:25 CEST