Re: XML or a relational Database ?
From: Leonardo B Lopes <leo_at_iems.nwu.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 14:21:42 -0600
Message-ID: <3AA000D6.B1161103_at_iems.nwu.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 14:21:42 -0600
Message-ID: <3AA000D6.B1161103_at_iems.nwu.edu>
DISCLAIMER: Just throwing ideas up in the air. I'll read the two papers
Carlos and Akmal mentioned, and maybe change my view, but here it goes:
How about the case in which you access most of your data sequentially,
you write once but read many, there are a lot of data and you don't want
to deal with Memory Management issues? That is the situation I am in
now, and I am using an RDB to get around the MM. But the XML libraries
(I naively assume) have pretty sophisticated MM built into them, so that
may be an option.
Florian Barbera wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> what would you be, according to you, the situation where you would use XML
> files (with a XML server if we need it) instead of a relational Database ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> Florian
-- ======================================================================= Leonardo B. Lopes leo_at_iems.nwu.edu Ph.D. Student (847)491-8470 IEMS - Northwestern University http://www.iems.nwu.edu/~leoReceived on Fri Mar 02 2001 - 21:21:42 CET
