Re: x*x+1=0
From: Jan Hidders <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.win.tue.nl>
Date: 22 Jan 2001 12:35:05 GMT
Message-ID: <94h9dp$ih8$2_at_news.tue.nl>
Date: 22 Jan 2001 12:35:05 GMT
Message-ID: <94h9dp$ih8$2_at_news.tue.nl>
David Cressey wrote:
> "Jan Hidders" <hidders_at_REMOVE.THIS.win.tue.nl> wrote in message
> news:94gv99$c38$2_at_news.tue.nl...
> >
> > Sounds interesting. Do you know what the 4th boolean value was?
>
> In the preface to the American Edition, it says this: [...]
>
> I note that, in the above, imaginary is listed as the fourth class,
> while meaningless is listed as third. This might be the answer to
> your question.
Yes it is. Thanks.
-- Jan HiddersReceived on Mon Jan 22 2001 - 13:35:05 CET