Re: Why are data types size limited?
Date: 2000/03/24
Message-ID: <38d9e477.8002877_at_News.CIS.DFN.DE>#1/1
"Joe \"Nuke Me Xemu\" Foster" <joe_at_bftsi0.UUCP> wrote:
>I can imagine a scheme which allows memos to be indexed. Only a
sure, but when does it really make sense to index a blob? ...ordering
>"reasonable" number of bytes are actually indexed, and another
that's what sqlaw does, for example
>"reasonable" number of bytes are actually stored in the record,
>with the rest stored wherever BLOB data is stored currently. If
sounds like paradox's memo-implementation, doesn't it?
>the text data is kept within "reasonable" bounds, performance
>is near what is currently acceptable for varchar data. However,
>if someone actually has an email address longer than 255 or so
>characters, it won't cause havoc in an app.
agreed, to be honest i don't understand why oracle for example makes an explicit difference between c(-haracter-)lobs and varchar2. probably historical reasons
ciao, jan
rs&p-Dossier: Software zur Erstellung technischer Dokumentationen
und Schriftgutes in Verwaltung und Industrie. Received on Fri Mar 24 2000 - 00:00:00 CET
