Re: OO fans bashing Joins
From: Tony <tony_at_my.isp>
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <qfhz4.390$KK.28231_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
Date: 2000/03/14
Message-ID: <qfhz4.390$KK.28231_at_bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>#1/1
topmind <topmindNOtoSPAM_at_technologist.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:08b33e6d.c6f67fd7_at_usw-ex0105-034.remarq.com...
> For one, there is no decent unbiased evidence that OO reduces
> lines of code for typical applications.
Sometimes you just gotta know. :) Seriously, it can do so IF you succeed in
developing
abstractions that you can reuse. If you're not good at that and can't find
or don't want someone
else's, then indeed, you'll probably be writing more code. But OO alone
won't do that. Chances
are that if one writes bad structural code, then the OO code won't be any
better. (Note that OO
follows directly from the best practices of good code builders).
Tony Received on Tue Mar 14 2000 - 00:00:00 CET
