Re: DB2 Crushes Oracle RAC on TPC-C benchmark

From: Mark A <nobody_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:11:40 -0700
Message-ID: <ucSdnWUuRdieWWzcRVn-oA_at_comcast.com>


"DA Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message news:41f1c249$1_1_at_127.0.0.1...
>
> What a laugh. Look at the small print at the bottom of the page:
>
> DB2 UDB on IBM eServer p595 (64-way Power5 1.9GHz)
>
> Oracle RAC 10g on HP Integrity rx5670 Cluster 64P (16 x 4-way Intel
> Itanium2 6M 1.5GHz)
>
> Is this a comparison of the database products DB2 UDB against Oracle or
> the p595 chips at 1.9GHz against the inferior Itanium2 1.5GHz chips.
>
> If IBM has to bend over this far to be faster it deserves to be kicked
> in the posterior with a boot.
>
> Shame on IBM for such pathetic nonsense. Shame on you for posting it.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan

If TPC benchmarks are pathetic nonsense, you will have to explain why Oracle is so heavily involved with the TPC organization. Many Oracle employees are on TPC committees, and some are in charge of those committees.

www.tpc.org
http://www.tpc.org/tpcc/results/tpcc_perf_results.asp

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/db2/benchmarks/111704.html

Shame on you for being in denial of an independent benchmark organization that is strongly supported by Oracle Corporation. Received on Sat Jan 22 2005 - 04:11:40 CET

Original text of this message