Re: db2 vs oracle
From: Data Goob <datagoob_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:06:06 -0400
Message-ID: <_VaYc.154264$W47.81894_at_fe54.usenetserver.com>
>
> I have the book. I have read the book. If you like to send me an address
> offline, I'll send it to you. Then you can actually quote chapter and
> verse to your heart's content.
>
Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well, are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I already know the answer, no need to reply. ) Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 04:06:06 CEST
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:06:06 -0400
Message-ID: <_VaYc.154264$W47.81894_at_fe54.usenetserver.com>
Mark Townsend wrote:
> Data Goob wrote:
>
>> >> Actually to get you back on track, read through Larry's book, the >> words are >> in the book, not quoting, but close enough, Oracle is more about >> applications >> than databases. ( the book is "SOFTWAR" ) >> >>
>
> I have the book. I have read the book. If you like to send me an address
> offline, I'll send it to you. Then you can actually quote chapter and
> verse to your heart's content.
>
Thanks but no thanks. I'll rely on my brief encounter with this tour de force in errors and omissions as having been enough reading about Larry and his obsessions for a while. It's a bit confusing to me when it comes to Oracle people, but also Microsoft people as well, are they passionate about the marketing or the technology? ( I think I already know the answer, no need to reply. ) Received on Sun Aug 29 2004 - 04:06:06 CEST