Re: optimum datatype for primary key column O9i
From: Sanjay Minni <sminni_SPAM_DIVERTER_at_planage.com>
Date: 30 Oct 2003 17:31:13 -0800
Message-ID: <4fe109d.0310301731.274d1963_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 30 Oct 2003 17:31:13 -0800
Message-ID: <4fe109d.0310301731.274d1963_at_posting.google.com>
"mcstock" <mcstock_at_enquery.com> wrote in message news:<v7ydncOSCsrTvTyiRVn-vg_at_comcast.com>...
> Sanjay,
>
> You're focusing much to much attention on what really is a non-issue. For
> many years, any type of NUMBER datatype has been the recommended datatype
> for PKs. Overhead of NUMBER(10) vs NUMBER vs NUMBER(10,0) etc, etc. is in
> reality not relevant.
>
> [...snip...]
> -- MCS
Thanks MCS,
Thats exactly what I was looking for
Regards
Sanjay
Received on Fri Oct 31 2003 - 02:31:13 CET