Re: Company thought DB2 will be better than Oracle.
From: Larry Edelstein <lsedels_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:36:31 GMT
Message-ID: <3F631D4B.899933B5_at_us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:36:31 GMT
Message-ID: <3F631D4B.899933B5_at_us.ibm.com>
Which many people see as an advantage by the way ...
Larry Edelstein
> "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1063411182.403065_at_yasure...
> > Mark A wrote:
>
> > Couldn't possibly be the lack of security without Tivoli or other
> > similar products?
> > Couldn't possibly be the lack of training classes?
> > Couldn't possibly be the lack of books?
> > Couldn't possibly be the fact that you need a C compiler on a production
> > box?
> > Couldn't possibly be the lack of third-party tools and applications?
> > Couldn't possibly be ....
>
> You forgot to mention that lovely old IBM tradition, BINDing.
Received on Sat Sep 13 2003 - 15:36:31 CEST