Re: Informix limitations, should we be using Oracle?
From: Art S. Kagel <kagel_at_bloomberg.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:07:12 -0400
Message-ID: <3DAEFC50.2090404_at_bloomberg.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:07:12 -0400
Message-ID: <3DAEFC50.2090404_at_bloomberg.net>
There is no comp.databases.oracle comp.databases.oracle is a node that breaks into comp.databases.orable.<whatever>. Used to lurk and post on two of the whatevers for a while.
Art S. Kagel
Andrew Hamm wrote:
> Jim Kennedy wrote:
>
>>Tim,
>>But this is an Oracle newsgroup so clearly Oracle is better. :-)
>>(reading comp.databases.oracle) Even though I've never used Informix,
>>clearly Oracle is better.
>>Jim
>
>
> How come my preferred newserver says that comp.databases.oracle doesn't
> exist??? It's a respectable server from .de... Have to go to this dodgy
> server to get the posting working.
>
> PS - clearly informix is better *pokes tongue out*
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 17 2002 - 20:07:12 CEST