Re: DBMS for W2K platform
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 13:11:04 GMT
Message-ID: <I1d97.74690$Xr6.343992_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
No problems with cross posting...
"Archie Dobrunk" <dbarchie_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:9b0ff9c7.0107251218.758d3_at_posting.google.com...
> I hope this does not start a flame war...
>
> Our company has chosen to standardize all of our servers (including DB
> servers) on W2K. I have a fairly good understanding of the
> differences between the big 3 DBMS's (SQL Server, DB2, and Oracle).
> My main focus has been with one of these DBMS's on a Unix platform, so
> currently I have little experience with Windows. What I would like
> feedback on, specifically, is what do each of these DBMS's do to
> exploit the Windows environment, and where are they lacking in a
> Windows only environment. In other words, I don't care that one can
> run on W2K, Sun, and OS/390. Our databases could grow to
> approximately 500 GB. Thank you very much...
>
> Arch
Received on Mon Jul 30 2001 - 15:11:04 CEST