Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8

From: Joshua Schaeffer <electric_ninja_at_email.msn.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 16:54:19 -0400
Message-ID: <ePPy407j#GA.51_at_cpmsnbbsa03>

>Oh, linux has _plenty_ of flaws, just fewer than WindowsNT for example.

Would you care to elaborate? And be specific. Received on Fri Apr 23 1999 - 22:54:19 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Yaron Adler: "please help with an Oracle question"
Previous message: Mel Christie: "ORA-22275: invalid LOB locator specified"
Maybe in reply to: Stephen Edwards: "More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8"
Next in thread: inswebqa_at_my-dejanews.com: "Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8"
Reply: The Ghost In The Machine: "Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8"
Reply: Craig Kelley: "Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8"
Reply: Leslie Mikesell: "Re: More benchmark bullshit, and Linux luser mating calls... (was Re: Linux betas NT in TPC testing, running Oracle8"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message