Re: Replication question
Date: 1998/07/09
Message-ID: <6o1b0l$qfm_at_news.it.gvsu.edu>#1/1
Keri Hardwick (kerih_at_sprintmail.com) wrote:
: Have to beg to differ with you here. I find Replication Manager an
: enormous pain to work with, and I'd avoid it unless you need one of its
: features, like scheduling synchronization. The graphics don't update
: properly to keep track of the replica sets, and since the whole point of
: it is to be a graphical interface, if the graphics are off, it's just
: not fun at all. It is far simpler IMO to just use the replication menu
: commands or code to manage the process.
:
: And using, or not using, replication manager has no impact on how Access
: handles autonumber fields.
:
: Keri Hardwick
Indirect replication is not possible nor is internet replication possible without the use of the replication manager. As for the graphics not updating correctly, I have never experienced this. The only problem that I have ran into with either stand alone replication or replication manager was a Novell Locking issue.
Not arguing just discussing!
Brett Selleck
Application Developer
Meijer Inc.
Received on Thu Jul 09 1998 - 00:00:00 CEST