Re: Performance on NT: Oracle vs. SQLServer?

From: Greg Stander <gstander_at_wg.capcon.com>
Date: 1997/03/25
Message-ID: <01bc3993$6c1f7d30$9df3d4a5_at_greg-home>#1/1


Well, I do not have any benchmarks comparing the two, but I'm running a database
with over 20GB with the configuration you have below using MS SQL. However,
there is not much insert activity - mostly searching. Greg

doug a blaisdell <dougb_at_world.std.com> wrote in article <E7M0FG.Iyp_at_world.std.com>...
> Hi out there!
>
> We're trying to decide between Oracle and SQL server, for a DSS database
 with
> about 200 Meg of data now, but much larger soon (eg 1 Gig). We've got a
 dual
> processor with 128 Meg (but could increase this), running NT 4.0.
>
> I've heard that Oracle doesn't run as fast on NT, as on UNIX. Have any of
 you
> had experience with either/both, or know of performance benchmarks of
 Oracle
> vs. NT??
>
> Any help appreciated...
>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Mar 25 1997 - 00:00:00 CET

Original text of this message