Re: Informix vs Oracle, alleged trade secret theft
From: No Spam Here <brtaylor_at_no.spam.com>
Date: 1997/02/05
Message-ID: <k8l9d5.2u.ln_at_localhost>#1/1
Date: 1997/02/05
Message-ID: <k8l9d5.2u.ln_at_localhost>#1/1
In article <32f7fca7.11155761_at_146.178.74.10>,
csimich_at_mail.ue.com.au (Christian Simich) writes:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 1997 13:45:05 -0500, netac <netac_at_worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
>
Oops! This is me. :-)
>>No Spam Here wrote:
>>>
[snip]
> How about both netac and 'no spam' are right.
>
> Like: There is a difference between the "skills/knowledge and product
> development". And there is also skills/knowledge which comes from and
> is required for product development.
>
> Am I right or am I right :-).
Actually your are close. The employer has first rights to knowledge gained while under contract or employment. These rights are restricted to the employers business.
-- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Bob Taylor Email: brtaylor_at_qtpi.lakewood.ca.us | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | A witty statement goes here! (when I get to it!) | +---------------------------------------------------------------+Received on Wed Feb 05 1997 - 00:00:00 CET