Re: [Q] what benefit I get from NOARCHIVELOG ???
Date: 1996/11/22
Message-ID: <1996Nov22.224840.26466_at_rossinc.com>#1/1
In article <01bbd815$aefdc4c0$619f21cc_at_djrubin.ix.netcom.com> "David J. Rubin" <djrubin_at_ix.netcom.com> writes:
>No other benefit... performance is the only reason for not implementing
>redolog archiving... that and a desire to commit professional suicide ;)
A small site that has an auto-cold-backup every night could reasonably do this. Many sites do it, and did it long before hot backups ever became trustworthy. The main requirement is to not care about redoing up to a days work if things go bad.
>
>MCC <duffy_at_cais.cais.com> wrote in article <572plb$kqp_at_news2.cais.com>...
>> I knew it is very danger if I don't setup Archive redo log mode? My
>> friend told me change from "Archivelog mode" to "Noarchivelog mode"
>> performance will improve a lot. Is it true? What other benefit I can
get
>> from "noarchivelog" ? Thank you for help.
>>
-- Joel Garry joelga_at_rossinc.com Compuserve 70661,1534 These are my opinions, not necessarily those of Ross Systems, Inc. <> <> %DCL-W-SOFTONEDGEDONTPUSH, Software On Edge - Don't Push. \ V / panic: ifree: freeing free inodes... OReceived on Fri Nov 22 1996 - 00:00:00 CET