Re: Raw partitions on HPUX 10 and Oracle 7.3.2
From: Michael J. Hillanbrand II <mjhii_at_pop.erols.com>
Date: 1996/09/26
Message-ID: <324ABCC4.446F_at_pop.erols.com>#1/1
Date: 1996/09/26
Message-ID: <324ABCC4.446F_at_pop.erols.com>#1/1
Marvin Suther wrote:
>
> We are in the process of setting up Oracle 7.3.2 on an HP 9000 Model 821
> running HP-UX 10.2. We are trying to figure out any
> advantages/disadvantages as to the use of raw partitions. Are there any
> whitepapers that deal with this? Any experineces, either good or bad? You
> can email me at marvin_suther_at_jhuapl.edu.
>
> Thanks.
--
Marvin,
You have inadvertently stumbled into a "RELIGOUS" issue.
If you look in the Oracle Performance Tuning Guide (small pamphlet
that comes with the three books they deign to send) you will find
contradictory statements regarding raw partitions.
I personally prefer file systems. If Oracle could sell a file system
manager, they would. I do not trust that blocks are written without
a parity check.
However, if you need parallel Server you are stuck , well maybe stuck. On EMC drives
you may get around the requirement for raw partions.
Eyal Aronnof of Quest Software has done a study of this from a conversation I
had with him a year ago. If I remember correctly he was getting fantastic
times from striped file system (LVM)
contact Gil Asherie gil_at_quests.com he may be able to confirm.
______________________________________________________________________________
Michael J. Hillanbrand II Dulcian, Inc.
Oracle Data Base Administration
Voice: 215-773-7307 Fax: 610-277-2966
mailto://mjhii_at_erols.com
Delaware Valley Oracle Users Group http://www.oug.com/OUG/DEVOUG/
SALTS A104, U.S. Naval Reserve http://www_salts.icpphil.navy.mil/reserves/
Received on Thu Sep 26 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST
