Re: cilinder 0 and raw devices

From: Brian Martin <icbkr_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: 1996/08/28
Message-ID: <3224678B.3B91_at_ix.netcom.com>#1/1

Brian P. Mac Lean wrote: (about C0 on raw)
> It's the same with Oracle. I saw a DBA at my previous site do it once on
>
> This seems to go away with the new array storage devices out these days. Disk
> partitions are not defined the same anymore.
>

We just went through this hoop. Even on a RAID array, the first A partition was ommitted from our RAW virtual device section. Oddly enough, if you RTFM you'll find this noted in the Oracle docs. It plainly says, don't do it.

bmartin
LAB-Interlink Received on Wed Aug 28 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Freas.Art_at_ist.vf.mmc.com: "Oracle and NT"
Previous message: Dave Mausner: "Re: Client-Installation SQL-NET Windows without ORAINST on every station?"
Maybe in reply to: Konstantin Ginzburg: "cilinder 0 and raw devices"
Next in thread: Tim Bower: "Re: OFA - Optimal Flexible Architecture"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message