Re: Mirrored disks Vs duplexed logs

From: Steve Lemme <rp1399_at_email.sps.mot.com>
Date: 1996/07/10
Message-ID: <rp1399-1007961245120001_at_m12cim15.sps.mot.com>#1/1


Sounds like you have a bad T500 systems we have had no problems with our system since it was purchased almost over a year ago.

Steve Lemme
DBA
MOTOROLA
>
> I both mirror my redo disks, and mirror the redos into two groups. Doing
> this both isolates from HW failure on a disk level (I am using HP-T500
> and disk related failures have been relatively high. i.e. controllers,
> disks, connections, etc.) and a logical failure (i.e. an SA runs fsck -y
> after a crash, or shutdown, and erases one of the sets).
>
> I have had my one and only experience where I had not mirrored my redos,
> but the disks were mirrored. The system crashed because of another
> hardware failure. The SA's tried bringing the box back up and were
> prompted to fsck the disk set where my only set of redos were. They ran
> fsck -y and promptly removed my redo logs. Of course there was no
> recovery. Also, my redos were erased on both sets of disks. We ALL
 

> -
> ERNST RENNER erenner_at_itthartford.com
 

-- 
When you are in it up to your ears....
Keep your mouth shut!
rp1399_at_email.sps.mot.com
Received on Wed Jul 10 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST

Original text of this message