Mirrored disks Vs duplexed logs
From: Steve Dodsworth] <Steven_Dodsworth_at_qsp.co.uk>
Date: 1996/07/02
Message-ID: <4rb9pi$ft3_at_mailhost.qsp.co.uk>#1/1
Date: 1996/07/02
Message-ID: <4rb9pi$ft3_at_mailhost.qsp.co.uk>#1/1
This seems a daft question, but here goes.
Oracle recommends having duplexed redo logs in case of disk failure. I read that to be similar to mirroring. If a database resides on a system that has disk mirroring, do the redo logs still have to be duplexed - I cannot think of a reason to still have more than one 'database defined' copy. Does any one know of any reason to keep two 'database configured' copies.
Bye,
Steve
opinions expressed are mine and do not
necessarily represent those of my employer
Received on Tue Jul 02 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST