Re: 7.x on NT 3.51

From: brian (bubba) martin <"brian>
Date: 1996/05/03
Message-ID: <318A51F6.7A38_at_mhasoftware.com>#1/1

mikec wrote:
>
> Could anyone comment briefly on how Oracle works on NT. Any reason NOT to
> use Oracle 7.x on NT 3.51?

it works great. less headache.
write if you want more details, i've had it up for several months.

and the top 10 reasons
why not use 7.x on nt3.51:
10. you own apple stock (sucker!)

9. your religion claims bgates is the anti-christ.
8. you own a copy of NT 4.0.
7. you think windows 95 is viable.
6. your positive that any os requiring 32 MB to 

run effectively on a PC can't be written correctly.

5. you already have a functioning sparc.
4. see 5, subst: HP, Alpha, etc...
3. you have a functioning linux box and can

program in perl relatively well.
2. you think assembler *is* object oriented.

and the number one reason why not to use oracle on NT is:

you borrowed a copy from the office to use at home and some guy in a polyesther suit and dark glasses keeps asking to use your phone to call the animal shelter (SPA or SPCA? hmmm)

-- 
===
Brian (bubba) Martin

We are what we post.

Received on Fri May 03 1996 - 00:00:00 CEST