Re: Normalizing vs. Denormalizing
From: Kevin Johnson Serco DPE/IO <johnson_at_mail.esrin.esa.it>
Date: 1996/03/26
Message-ID: <3157ADF8.289_at_mail.esrin.esa.it>#1/1
Date: 1996/03/26
Message-ID: <3157ADF8.289_at_mail.esrin.esa.it>#1/1
Suu Quan wrote:
>
> :comp.databases.oracle / Will Kooiman <wkooiman_at_csac.com> / 2:58 pm Mar 20, 1996 /
> >a normalized design will outperform a denomalized design.
>
> I experienced the exact opposite.
>
"Horses for courses"
i.e. Your design should be optimised for the performance to the transactions/queries
you will actually perform.
I am sure that your experiences are both true but represent experience of different types of usage.
At the risk of over-generalising :
- a normalised design is probably better where you have many UPDATES
- a denormalised design is probably better where you have many QUERIES
Kevin
| / _ o _ | _ | _ _ _ _ _ EMAIL : johnson_at_mail.esrin.esa.it || /_|\ /||/ | |/ \|/ ||/ ||_ / \|/ | PHONE : (+39) 6 941 80 633 | \\__ \/ || | \_/\_/| || |__|\_/| | ADDRESS : European Space Agency Via Galileo Galilei Information Administrator Frascati 00044 ITALIA.Received on Tue Mar 26 1996 - 00:00:00 CET