Re: Oracle replication wasRe: Sybase 11 TPCC on DEC (your comments please)
From: Norman M. <GregC_at_megaweb.com>
Date: 1996/01/30
Message-ID: <4ek3tr$krd_at_news-e1a.megaweb.com>#1/1
Greg Carter Received on Tue Jan 30 1996 - 00:00:00 CET
Date: 1996/01/30
Message-ID: <4ek3tr$krd_at_news-e1a.megaweb.com>#1/1
tkyte_at_us.oracle.com (Thomas J Kyte) wrote:
>odysscci_at_teleport.com (Jim Kennedy) wrote:
(Actually, this was me that wrote the following)
>>>While with the two-phased commit strategy you can be sure that all
>>>replicate databases are consistent at any given time with the primary,
>>>performance does suffer and the possibility of transaction rollback at
>>>all sites increases with each replicate database entered into the
>>>system - if one replicate database is unavailable, the transaction
>>>fails at all sites.
>Nope, the above is completely wrong.
OkeyDokey. I'll endeavor to get my facts straight in the future.
>Thomas Kyte
>tkyte_at_us.oracle.com
>Oracle Government
Greg Carter Received on Tue Jan 30 1996 - 00:00:00 CET