Re: TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)

From: Lisa Roderick <roderick_at_eps.enet.dec.com>
Date: 1996/01/11
Message-ID: <4d3nl2$5nt_at_nntpd.lkg.dec.com>#1/1

In article <goodman_alan-1001960557090001_at_130.252.127.171>, goodman_alan_at_tandem.com says...
>
>The top PERFORMANCE records on TPC-C are held by Tandem computers
>K10000
>series systems running NonStop SQL. (actually Tandem holds the top two
>spots)
>
>This has been true for over 18 months!! - Still unbeaten
>
>The PRICE/performance record for TPC-C has changed many times during that
>period and been held by many different databases and systems.

Ya, but the Tandem cost/tpmC is up at around US$1,900. Compare this with Digital's $222/tpmC on Sybase and $316/tpmC for Oracle on the AlphaServer 8400.

-- 
Lisa Roderick
Applications Systems Engineering Performance Group
Digital Equipment Corporation
Nashua, NH
lisa.roderick_at_zko.mts.dec.com

Received on Thu Jan 11 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Lisa Roderick: "Re: TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"
Previous message: Francis E. Chang: "Re: TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"
Maybe in reply to: Alan Goodman: "TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"
In reply to Alan Goodman: "TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"
Next in thread: Lisa Roderick: "Re: TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"
Reply: Lisa Roderick: "Re: TPCC - for the record it's Tandem (was Sybase 11 TPCC)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message