Re: Solaris X86 experiences?

From: Daren L. Janes <daren_at_morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
Date: 1996/01/08
Message-ID: <daren.306.00096631_at_morgan.ucs.mun.ca>#1/1

In article <enduser-0401961956340001_at_dial-cup3-15.iway.aimnet.com> enduser_at_enduser.com (EndUser) writes:
>From: enduser_at_enduser.com (EndUser)
>Subject: Re: Solaris X86 experiences?
>Date: Thu, 04 Jan 1996 19:56:34 -0800

>i am still wondering, why arent you using NT. that is
>cost effective.

EndUser, are you saying that Solaris X86 is not cost effective? The fact that I have built up a lot of confidence in running oracle on Sparc Solaris with a peak 200 concurrent users, I think that their X86 version deserves a look. I have little or no experience with Oracle on NT as of yet! Our shop has a lot of experience running Oracle on Unix and that is a mojor factor.

Why would you not consider Solaris X86?

Daren Received on Mon Jan 08 1996 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ed Bruce: "Re: Dealing with size limitations in PL/SQL"
Previous message: lally_at_mail.sep.bnl.gov: "Re: Interfacing Oracle Database to the WWW"
Maybe in reply to: Daren L. Janes: "Solaris X86 experiences?"
Next in thread: Ed Bruce: "Re: Dealing with size limitations in PL/SQL"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message