Re: Sybase, Oracle or DB2???
From: Gordon E. Hooker <gordonh_at_acslink.net.au>
Date: 1995/10/19
Message-ID: <466dv6$94a_at_peg.apc.org>#1/1
Date: 1995/10/19
Message-ID: <466dv6$94a_at_peg.apc.org>#1/1
tillkahle_at_aol.com (TillKahle) wrote:
>You wrote that bank for the buck might be a reason to buy MS SQL.
>From my experience I can tell that declarative referential integrity
>and reliable two-phase commits are a big pain in the ass with MS SQL.
>I've tried Oracle and Watcom and if you don't want to spend a month
>troubleshooting Oracle triggers, Rollback segments etc. Watcom SQL 4.0
>is a very good bet on a couple of different platforms.
My sources tell me that Watcom SQL 4.0 is OK if you have no reason to try and restore the database after a crash.
>RE: PC Magazine, October 11, 1994 gives a good summary.
>Good luck,
>T. Kahle, Hamburg
-----------------------------\ooOoo/----------------------------------- Gordon Hooker MACS PCP ,--_|\ 25 Clarke Street, Ripley, Queensland, 4306, Australia / \ gordonh_at_acslink.net.au \_.--._/ mobile: 018883835 phone: 61-7-2889716 V -----------------------------------------------------------------------It is far better to remain silent and appear a fool, than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt... Received on Thu Oct 19 1995 - 00:00:00 CET