Re: RAID 5 performance

From: Paul Collins <76004.2053_at_CompuServe.COM>
Date: 1995/10/18
Message-ID: <462v9a$q07$2_at_mhadg.production.compuserve.com>#1/1

Using a parity disk is not RAID5. I think that is RAID3 or RAID4. RAID5 spreads the parity over all drives. I'm glad you posted your results though. I've been preaching against RAID5 for RDBMS systems for years. Raid0+1 is the way to go. I've been using it since 1992.

-- 
Paul Collins
DBA
DATASTORM Technologies

Received on Wed Oct 18 1995 - 00:00:00 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tom Cooke: "Re: Strange linker error"
Previous message: Mike Rife: "Re: Generating Forms 2.3 .inp file from .frm"
Maybe reply: Ashley: "Re: RAID 5 performance"
Maybe reply: Duncan Young: "Re: RAID 5 performance"
Maybe reply: R Glenn Stauffer: "Re: RAID 5 performance"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message