Rule-based vs Cost-based Optimizer?

From: Tony Bravo <tbrav_at_ctp.com>
Date: 14 Mar 1995 20:23:39 -0500
Message-ID: <tbrav.795230494_at_ctp.com>

Hi there,

Does anyone have any comments regarding the cost based optimizer (which presumably now works bug-free) in 7.1.4.1.0 ?

Has anyone done a comparison between rule and cost-based?

Thanks
Tony Bravo
tbrav_at_ctp.com

--
__________________________________________________________________________
Tony Bravo <tbrav_at_ctp.com>             Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.
                                  2361 Rosecrans Ave, El Segundo, CA 90245
                                       Tel: 310-297-3804 FAX: 310-297-3900

Received on Wed Mar 15 1995 - 02:23:39 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kyp Carlton: "Storing/Retrieving BMP bitmaps using VB and Oracle"
Previous message: Rune Olsen: "Personal Oracle 7 & WIN 95"
Next in thread: Rich Bromberg: "Re: Rule-based vs Cost-based Optimizer?"
Reply: Rich Bromberg: "Re: Rule-based vs Cost-based Optimizer?"
Maybe reply: Andrew Calvin: "Re: Rule-based vs Cost-based Optimizer?"
Maybe reply: Barry Roomberg: "Re: Rule-based vs Cost-based Optimizer?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message