Re: More than 254 cols in table?
From: Kent Milligan <kmill_at_hawkeyes.rchland.ibm.com>
Date: 2 Mar 1995 15:14:03 GMT
Message-ID: <3j4nbr$uru_at_locutus.rchland.ibm.com>
Date: 2 Mar 1995 15:14:03 GMT
Message-ID: <3j4nbr$uru_at_locutus.rchland.ibm.com>
In article <D4qJHA.FKM_at_freenet.carleton.ca>, ah513_at_FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Doug Harris) writes:
|> In a previous posting, Steve Edelstein (74160.645_at_CompuServe.COM) writes:
|>
|> At least Oracle is one of the better ones at 254.
|> --
I think the 254 limit pales in comparison to the 8000 column limit supported by DB2/400. I know of a couple of our customers that are well over 254 columns, but my mind is drawing a blank at the business process that requires this at the moment.
-- Kenton Milligan DB2/400 Development IBM Rochester-AS/400 Division kmill_at_rchland.vnet.ibm.com GO HAWKEYES!! (opinions stated are not necessarily those of my employer)Received on Thu Mar 02 1995 - 16:14:03 CET