Re: low end oracle, who needs it?
From: DavidJRoth <davidjroth_at_aol.com>
Date: 17 Dec 1994 11:30:10 -0500
Message-ID: <3cv3mi$87f_at_newsbf01.news.aol.com>
Date: 17 Dec 1994 11:30:10 -0500
Message-ID: <3cv3mi$87f_at_newsbf01.news.aol.com>
In article <1994Dec16.044940.9831_at_salad.jip.co.jp>, akira_at_st.jip.co.jp (Akira Hashimoto) writes:
If "Low End Oracle" is 100% compatible --- what is different?
Is this just a licensing issue, e.g., less users for less money?
Are there some features that go away?
Is there anything I can do at the high end that I can't do at the low end?
Received on Sat Dec 17 1994 - 17:30:10 CET