Re: Net Bandwith: X-Server vs PC Client/Server
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 1994 16:29:08 GMT
Message-ID: <1994Jan21.162908.9101_at_swan.pyr>
In article <2hgpd4$87m_at_infosrv.edvz.univie.ac.at> Bernhard Strassl wrote:
-| In article <wdawson.758730986_at_willard.atl.ga.us>, wdawson_at_willard.atl.ga.us (Willard Dawson) writes:
-| |> bernhard_at_trick.ani.univie.ac.at (Bernhard Strassl) writes:
-| |>
-| |> MS-Windows stuff" under WABI, I believe you're being extremely
-| |> optimistic.
-| |>
-| Sorry, I did'nt specify which kind of applications I expect to run
-| under WABI:
-| Non-client/server end user programs like word processors, spreadsheets,
-| drwaing programs etc.
-| These are the Windows apps which many UNIX users are missing on their
-| system because of the extremely high pricing of aequivalent UNIX products.
-| (i.e. compare WordPerfect for MS-Win and WordPerfect for SUN)
Point taken.
-| I do NOT expect databases and Windows GUI development stuff running
-| under WABI - maybe it does someday, but I prefer developing new
-| applications under UNIX...
From what has been seen and heard of WABI so far I would say "Ask Sun whether WABI supports ANY application, tool or other program."
The literature states that WABI initially will only support 13 apps.
However, I would not assume that it will be usable on all of those. E.g. some apps take several minutes to load files that load in seconds on a PC.
Also, certain things - e.g. use of ATM - require you to get hold of a 'real' copy of Windows and install it.
Of course, WABI will certainly get better given time.
For more info, BYTE is currently doing a comparison of WABI.
-- Peter Ivimey-Cook Please note that I do not speak for my employer in any way. My opinions are my own, and will hopefully stay that way!Received on Fri Jan 21 1994 - 17:29:08 CET