Re: OCI vs. Pro*C

From: Bruce MacDonald <Bruce_MacDonald_at_mindlink.bc.ca>
Date: 9 Jan 94 02:22:55 GMT
Message-ID: <36131_at_mindlink.bc.ca>

Why would you NOT want to use Pro*C? The OCI calls are quite low-level. Using Pro*C just saves a lot of grunt work.

--
Bruce MacDonald
Database Systems Consultant

Email: Bruce_MacDonald_at_mindlink.bc.ca

Received on Sun Jan 09 1994 - 03:22:55 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Smith: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"
Previous message: John Vasicek: "database evaluation reports"
Maybe in reply to: Mark.Lawrence: "OCI vs. Pro*C"
Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"
Reply: Tim Smith: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"
Reply: Al Parker: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"
Reply: Michael P. Stein: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"
Reply: Sten Folkerman -Enea: "Re: OCI vs. Pro*C"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message