Re: Using SQL*Plus with SQL Assistant in large db

From: Ed Prochak <edprochak_at_gmail.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2007 12:08:30 -0800
Message-ID: <1170360510.251071.15870_at_s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>


On Jan 26, 1:30 am, "SQLJ" <sqlju..._at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't know about you, but I personally like it more and more. It saves
> a lot of my time and makes me more productive. I can get full context
> sensitive syntax of any command in seconds, not going to any web sites
> or books, not to mention that I don't need to remembers hundreds of
> thousands of table and columns names, packages, their public procedures
> and their parameters. The only thing I don't like so far is handling of
> sub queries in joins, but I can live with that.
>
> I have a funny feeling that you guys haven't even tried it, yet
> expressing your opinion in a way like you are the top authority here.
>

You ask for opinions then complain they don't match what you expect. Hey, this is usenet.

You ask about the tool as if you never tried it, then sing it's praises. Be open from the start.

You are told about another option, then reply quotine an unrelated post. Be more organized.

You top post every time because it is easier. Be more polite.

You reply to Michel spelling it Michael. Proof read before you post.

So far you seem to need a lot of work on your posting skills. On the plus side you do seem to say thank you. But please reconsider your habit of top posting.

  Ed

A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Received on Thu Feb 01 2007 - 21:08:30 CET

Original text of this message