Re: Code in the database or middle tier (the CLR controversy)

From: DA Morgan <damorgan_at_psoug.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:51:08 -0700
Message-ID: <1117633737.926269_at_yasure>


SAN3141_at_netscape.net wrote:

> There doesn't seem to be consensus about when to put code in the
> database or in the middle tier.

Actually there is ... among professionals that have an understanding of data integrity and security. And of course among those who work in countries such as the US (think SarbOx and HIPAA) where you can not comply with federal law if you don't.

  > Elsewhere there's been discussion about Microsoft SQL Server 2005
> adding the CLR to support stored procedures in languages such as C#. A
> scan of the Web and discussion forums finds differing opinions about
> this.

I really really really want Microsoft to add C# and VB to SQL Server 2005. It will do more to kill the product than anything Oracle or IBM could add to theirs. And given the products lack of security, stability, and scalability ... it deserves to be gutted by Microsoft's own hand.

-- 
Daniel A. Morgan
http://www.psoug.org
damorgan_at_x.washington.edu
(replace x with u to respond)
Received on Wed Jun 01 2005 - 15:51:08 CEST

Original text of this message