Re: Pro*C mode problem

I believe that I followed those rules just fine. If you are referring to the "before you ask section"....

1. Try to find an answer by searching the Web.
   • I did tons of searching about this and found nothing.
2. Try to find an answer by reading the manual.
   • The manual doesn't seem to covert this problem. I post because according to the manual, what I am doing should work.
3. Try to find an answer by reading a FAQ.
   • Again, nothing found on the problem here.
4. Try to find an answer by inspection or experimentation.
   • Did tons of experimenting, even with the simplest piece of code which was posted above.
5. Try to find an answer by asking a skilled friend.
   • I don't know anyone with Pro*C experience, sorry!
6. If you are a programmer, try to find an answer by reading the source code.
   • This is not applicable in this case.

Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<uMQ%c.10962$w%6.7362_at_newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
> Rocky Dean Pulley wrote:
>
> >>What is the difference with your post 15 hours earlier?
> >
> >
> > I really hate people like you, what was the point of your post, to
> > prove what a dick you are? If you really want to know the difference,
> > it was on another group and it had code posted with it.
>
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Received on Fri Sep 10 2004 - 00:47:37 CEST