Re: SQL*Plus replacement available - SPAM SPAM SPAM
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:29:14 -0700
Message-ID: <1086240564.233750_at_yasure>
no_at_spam.com wrote:
>>You are promoting a product. >>
>
>
> I wrote a tool. I want to know what others think of it.
And I think you have every right to do so. But you could have been [Quoted] courteous and followed the rules and posted your request to comp.databases.oracle.marketplace. You chose not to. You chose to spam us.
If you want
> to call that "promoting a product" go ahead. What do you have against
> products? Is it your goal to live in a product-free world?
Not at all. I sell design, create, and sell products. But I do so in a manner that is consistent with the rules. I don't hold it against you that you have a product. I don't hold it against you that you are asking for Beta testers.
[Quoted] I hold it against you that you (A) didn't read the charter or (B) read it and chose to ignore it and/or (C) having been notified that you have [Quoted] violated the charter and spammed us haven't had the courtesy, the civility, or the maturity required to apologize for your error.
>>You are spamming. >>Stop it! >>Or is courtesy too difficult a concept for you? >>
>
> Writing a useful tool and giving it away is a good thing, in my book.
And in ours to. Posting a message in an inappropriate usenet group, [Quoted] however, has nothing to do with writing a useful tool. It has nothing to do with giving it away. And because you have been so rude few if [Quoted] any of us have any interest in you or your book except to the extent that we would like you to either suddenly mature, apologize, and repost in the appropriate usenet group or just go away.
The choice is yours.
-- Daniel Morgan http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/oad/oad_crs.asp http://www.outreach.washington.edu/ext/certificates/aoa/aoa_crs.asp damorgan_at_x.washington.edu (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)Received on Thu Jun 03 2004 - 07:29:14 CEST