Re: Learning/Teaching SQL

From: Jarmo <jarmo_at_jarmo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:11:07 -0500
Message-ID: <3fc21f6f$0$13343$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>

"Sybrand Bakker" <gooiditweg_at_nospam.demon.nl> wrote in message news:nbk3sv81ai5k7oeosjc67mqfrf1l4vb9s4_at_4ax.com...
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 20:08:46 -0500, "Jarmo" <jarmo_at_jarmo.com> wrote:
>
> >Does it have to be Oracle? If not, then I'd look for the cheapest, most
> >usable database that supports SQL.
>
> Could you PLEASE get lost here? I mean get lost NOW!!!!
> Oracle IS usable provided you are not both AND STUPID AND LAZY
>
>
> --
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA

I'm not here to make your life miserable Sybrand, so can we go back to step 1? Received on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 16:11:07 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Oracle DBA Studio, almost useful"
Previous message: Norman Dunbar: "Re: Rapid development tool for Web based DB application needed"
Maybe in reply to: Lee: "Learning/Teaching SQL"
In reply to Sybrand Bakker: "Re: Learning/Teaching SQL"
Next in thread: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Oracle DBA Studio, almost useful"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message