Re: Is it possible to put primary and standby database on the same machine
From: Matthias Rogel <rogel_at_web.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:39:06 +0100
Message-ID: <at497a$10aver$1_at_ID-86071.news.dfncis.de>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 10 2002 - 09:39:06 CET
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:39:06 +0100
Message-ID: <at497a$10aver$1_at_ID-86071.news.dfncis.de>
[Quoted] ok, when we are crossposting propaganda:
[Quoted] vmware is good, but note that there is a free - and also good -
alternative on
http://bochs.sourceforge.net/
Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> Are you using the OEM wizards?
>
> Because if so, memory tells me that it can't be done on the same machine,
> unless you do some fiddling with multiple listeners.
>
> But... there's a simple solution. And it's called VMware.
>
> Anytime you want to do things that need two (or more) machines, but you only
> have one PC on which to practice, VMware will fix it. www.vmware.com.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
> "Ban Spam" <ban-spam_at_operamail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns92DFAEF87792FSunnySD_at_68.6.19.6...
>
>>u705413818_at_spawnkill.ip-mobilphone.net (Joe Sath) wrote in >>news:l.1039471656.1286895751_at_wayne-nat.traffic.com: >> >> >>>I am learning dataGuard 9i, but I can not afford two machines. >>>Has anybody tried to put both instance on the same machine? >>>Will that work? >> >>Define "work"? >> >>If the system has a catestrophic failure & refuses to operate, >>what have you gained by running Data Guard on a 2nd instance? >> >> >>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 10 2002 - 09:39:06 CET