place holder vs. summary column
From: Pieter <phuiberts-123_at_ivwnet.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 11:42:12 -0400
Message-ID: <3D0CB1D4.8070504_at_ivwnet.com>
Hello,
I ran into a test question that I don't quite understand, and I hope you experts can help me out a bit. The question:
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2002 11:42:12 -0400
Message-ID: <3D0CB1D4.8070504_at_ivwnet.com>
Hello,
I ran into a test question that I don't quite understand, and I hope you experts can help me out a bit. The question:
Which type of column would you use to store the names of the regions
with the largest and smallest total salery values?
Answer (relevant ones)
- Place Holder
- Summary
According to the questions makers 'Place Holder' is the correct answer with no explenation. My questions is why?
I thought Summary was correct because it allows you to change the
property pallette and easily get the largest and smallest total saleries.
--> Where do I go wrong in my thinking?
Thanks a lot,
Pieter
--
Remove '-123' (no quotes) from the e-mail address when you wish to reply
-Happy Trails ;-)
Received on Sun Jun 16 2002 - 17:42:12 CEST
