Re: Oracle 8i for NT work with FAT ?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 10:49:07 +0100
Message-ID: <988019382.14406.0.nnrp-14.c30bdde2_at_news.demon.co.uk>
[Quoted] While I did think I wouldn't bother responding to someone whose main argument is "it's full rubbish" (not the most well reasoned point I've ever [Quoted] heard...), it is a fact that NTFS *could* save you from having to recover a [Quoted] database where FAT could not. Surely your vast technical knowledge can [Quoted] imagine such a scenario.
Thanks for re-iterating my point about FAT being faster however.
"Andrey" <aakit_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
news:9br9hs$2k3n$1_at_josh.sovintel.ru...
> It's full rubbish
>
> FAT is much faster
>
> NTFS is for file servers, not db servers
>
> All what is written about NTFS (recoverable, chains/abandoned clusters
etc)
> have no effect on quality of database itself and db files.
Received on Mon Apr 23 2001 - 11:49:07 CEST